Archive for May, 2010

Pakistan court lifts Facebook ban, restrictions remain

May 31st, 2010

Islamabad: A Pakistani court on Monday lifted a ban on social networking website Facebook which had carried a competition to draw the Prophet Mohammad, but access to any “blasphemous” material will remain blocked, a lawyer said.
Any representation of the Prophet Mohammad is deemed un-Islamic and blasphemous by Muslims, which constitute the overwhelming majority in Pakistan and Facebook was blocked two weeks ago because of the online caricature contest.
The Lahore High Court ordered Facebook unblocked after getting assurance from the government that “blasphemous material” would no longer be available in Pakistan, lawyer Azhar Siddique told Reuters.
“The government has assured the court on behalf of the website that the blasphemous material would not seen in Pakistan,” said Siddique, a representative of the Islamic Lawyers Forum, who sought ban on Facebook.
“The court … told me that I can file a contempt of court petition if blasphemous material is again seen on the website in Pakistan, because it is a violation of Pakistani law.”
Facebook was still unavailable mid-day in Islamabad, but was expected to return by the evening.
The Pakistani authorities had also blocked access to video networking site, YouTube, to contain un-Islamic content, but this was partially lifted last week although links to videos containing “sacrilegious or profane material” remain restricted.
The contest to draw caricatures of Prophet Mohammad was described by its organisers as a “snarky” response to Muslim bloggers who had objected at the creators of the Comedy Central television show “South Park” depicting him in a bear suit.
While many Pakistanis supported the online crackdown, some said the government should have blocked specific videos or pages instead of blocking entire websites.
The publication of cartoons of the Prophet in Danish newspapers in 2005 sparked deadly protests in Muslim countries. About 50 people were killed during violent protests in Muslim countries in 2006, five of them in Pakistan.
On Sunday, Bangladesh, another majority Muslim country, also blocked access to Facebook over “objectionable” material about the Prophet Mohammad.

Courtesy: LiveMint

Mobiles, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth: preserving culture, heritage

May 31st, 2010

Recently, I was invited to Malaga in Spain and was told that I must visit Cordova and Granada to see the rich Moorish cultural heritage. I found both the places engrossing. Granada is famous for its landmark United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (Unesco) World Heritage monument called Alhambra, and I have no words to explain its beauty and architecture.

What caught my attention was the use of a simple technology to enhance visitor experience. A counter just inside the Alhambra entrance provides audio guides that look like mobile handsets and cost €6. But observant visitors would see a blue board that reads: Bluetooth Kiosk Alhambra Audio Guide.
All I had to do was to switch on the Bluetooth option in my mobile, and I had the entire audio guide in my handset, narrating the fascinating story of Alhambra in an interactive manner. Not only did I manage to save €6, but I was also able to carry back my beautiful memory of Alhambra with me. I wondered how a country like India, with its enormous cultural wealth, could benefit from such innovations.
India can turn its cultural heritage into a source of economic strength by using mobile and related applications, as at Alhambra. Technology can enable monuments to improve as revenue earners and this can double the efforts of preservation.
There are around 1,200 monuments and heritage buildings in Delhi, down from 1,317 in 1914. The Delhi Archaeological Department, along with the Indian National Trust For Art and Cultural Heritage (INTACH), has identified 250 lesser-known monuments and collected complete information on them—including statistical data, historical facts, maps and photographs.
And 18 of them are being thoroughly documented before the Commonwealth Games begin in October. The Alhambra excitement enthused me to hold a brief talk with the Delhi government’s arts and culture secretary and propose to install Bluetooth kiosks at each of the 250 lesser-known monuments as well as in the 400 villages that Delhi has.
My argument: Even uninterested visitors could download informative files about the monuments; this would spread the history, photographs and even anecdotes related to the monuments worldwide and create more awareness about local culture and heritage, that too in digital format.
Even as the Delhi government explores the idea, we have planned to create a mobile-enabled wireless mesh in Chanderi, Madhya Pradesh. It will cover 3,000 weaving families in a radius of 5-7km. The ruins of more than 300 monuments are located here. With the help of Internet Society (ISOC), the idea is to create a seamless network of knowledge in Chanderi with hotspots and Bluetooth-enabled points.
We have already digitized the information for about 300 monuments and are now recording voiceovers on all of them—including anecdotes narrated in an interactive manner. When tourists visit the sites, they would feel being a part of it and go away with memories to spread around the world.
There are two reasons why I am highlighting culture and heritage in this column. One, preservation of art, culture and heritage is one of the prime responsibility of those in the relevant institutions. Two, there is very little visible effort to including new technological tools and platforms like mobile phone applications to preserve, sustain and promote cultural heritage.
Indeed, the first move towards this is extremely limited and reflects how far behind we are in using simple mobile and wireless technologies. This will not only spread awareness about the culture and heritage of the country, but also help preserve this culture with the active participation of citizens.
India thrives on “innovation by necessity”. An example: I was in Nalgonda in Andhra Pradesh a couple of years ago, participating in a self-help group training programme. I observed that most of the 30-odd women with mobile phones were receiving calls that they wouldn’t attend but leave the phone to ring on low volume.
I asked them why, and their reply stunned me. One of them said, “We don’t have to attend the calls; we get (the) message through the number of rings and missed calls… For example, if I receive three missed calls, it means my husband is home; two missed call means (the) kids have arrived home, and so on.” Can you beat that?
Osama Manzar is founder and director of Digital Empowerment Foundation and chairman of the mBillionth awards. Mint is a partner of the mBillionth awards.
For more details on nominees, nominee profiles and the mBillionth awards, log on to http://blog.livemint.com/mobile-movement

Courtesy: LiveMint

ThoughtWorks gives agile IT an online forum

May 29th, 2010

ThoughtWorks unveiled this week an online community focused on exchange of ideas and best practices related to agile software development.

Called “Agile Transitions,” the community is intended for discussion of executive- and business-level issues pertaining to “agile IT,” according to ThoughtWorks, which sells products for agile application lifecycle management.

Courtesy: Infoworld News

Learning From Rejection: The Questions to Ask When You Don’t Get The Job

May 29th, 2010

When you got cut from your high school chess team, you asked your mom if you could transfer schools.

When you thought that you and that awesome guy were more than just friends — and thought wrong, you spent the next three days in your pajamas.

When you went on an awesome interview, but the job went to another candidate, you vowed to learn the pots and pans and spend the rest of your life as a street performer.

We’ve all been there.

Rejection is just one of those things that, no matter how many times it happens in life, it never gets any easier. However, it doesn’t always have to result in self-loathing and days spent moping around in your pjs. In fact, John Kador, author of “301 Best Questions to Ask on Your Interview,” dedicates an entire chapter of his book to  rejection, and how it can actually have a positive effect on your job search — if you take advantage of it by finding out why you didn’t get the job.

True, it may seem like adding salt to your wound to reach out to the refusing employer and ask “What’s so wrong with me?” However, doing so can also be one of the most rewarding ways to handle a rejection, since any constructive feedback you receive can be applied to your future job search.

Also true, is that positively handling rejection is a lot easier said than done, so below are the top tips for following up with a company that has turned you down, adapted from Kador’s “301 Best Questions to Ask On Your Interview.”

1. Figure out where the recruiter was coming from

Sometimes, you will have a hunch as to why you were rejected. Maybe you were under- qualified, or maybe you set your salary expectations too high. But on those occasions where you were completely blindsided by the rejection, understanding it will take some further investigation.

Usually, this involves contacting the recruiter. Start by sending a simple note. Something like:

“Thank you again for interviewing me. I understand your decision to go with another candidate and I accept your decision. I’d appreciate any feedback you can give me.” 

Sometimes, this will be enough to get you a constructive dose of honesty. However, HR departments are often apprehensive to give straightforward feedback these days, due to a fear of lawsuits. But, that doesn’t mean you should just accept their generic response saying “You were great, but the other candidate was better.”

2. Cut to the point

To increase your odds of getting true, useful criticism, take your query one step further, by following up with something along the lines of:

“I need to improve my interviewing skills and I’m asking for your help. I am asking you to be honest about my performance and what I could have done better. If you do, I will make you three promises. First, I promise I will not interrupt you. Second, I promise I will not defend myself. Third, I promise I will not contact you or your company for a year. Will you help me?”

This approach lets the HR rep know that you have no interest in hounding them or pleading your case, and are genuinely interested in honest feedback.  It should also help ease the recruiter’s fear of getting in trouble.

When using this approach, though, be ready to keep your promises or risk putting your reputation with the company — and possibly the industry — on the line.

3. Be gracious

If directly asking the recruiter for interview feedback still seems too intimidating, at least send a thank-you note. Many interviewees discontinue professional niceties when they don’t get the job, but genuinely thanking the interviewer for their time makes a good final impression. If possible, prove your gratitude by:

  • Recommending another good candidate for the position
  • Offering a sales lead
  • Including a link to an article, website or job-board you think the recruiter would find useful
  • Asking if there is anything else you can do for the recruiter or the company

Simple gestures like the ones above will make you stand out to the recruiter, who will be more apt to keep you in mind for future jobs at the company.

Hopefully, you won’t face too much (if any) rejection during your job search, but if you do, the above guidelines will help turn a negative response into a learning experience. Be sure to personalize these steps based on your individual interview situation and what you feel comfortable with.  If you don’t think you can handle hearing a less-than-glowing review from a recruiter without interrupting, you may want to skip step No. 2. For more suggestions on what to ask before, during and after an interview, check out “301 Best Questions to Ask on Your Interview.”

Related posts:

  1. 5 rules for asking better interview questions With the addition of 573,000 nonfarm payroll jobs since December,…
  2. Answering Tough Interview Questions Among all the questions we receive, one of the most…
  3. Talk to The Work Buzz! Contest: Ask us a question about interviews Hello, everyone- As our last post said, we’re holding a…

Courtesy: The Work Buzz

Buyers flock as Apple’s iPad hits Asia

May 29th, 2010

Tokyo: Apple Inc’s iPad launched in overseas store shelves on Friday, with buyers storming Japanese and Australian shops to be among the first outside the United States to snap up the long awaited tablet PC.
The device, which has a 9.7-inch (24.6 cm) colour touchscreen for surfing the Web, watching movies, playing games and reading e-books, goes on sale in Germany, France, Italy, Switzerland, Spain, Britain and Canada later on Friday.
Apple has sold a million iPads in the US since its 3 April debut, exceeding even the most bullish pre-launch estimates. Demand was so heavy the company had to delay the international roll-out by a month.
At Apple’s flagship store in Tokyo’s Ginza shopping district, about 1,200 people formed a line that stretched some 800 metres.
When a bell on the roof of the nearby Wako department store rang at 0800 local time, the store opened to loud cheers from waiting customers. The street was so packed with customers and media that police warned Apple employees to clear the sidewalk.
“I wanted to touch it as soon as possible. I felt real excitement when it was finally in my hands,” said Takechiyo Yamanaka, 19, who camped out in front of the Ginza store from Wednesday evening to be the first in line.
Across town, Softbank Corp, a mobile phone provider and distributor of Apple products in Japan, held an event at its Omotesando outlet for the iPad that was carried live on Japanese morning TV news programs.
While Apple’s high-profile launch of the iPad has set the early standard for the tablet category, rival offerings from Sony Corp, Hewlett-Packard and Dell will ensure tough competition ahead.
The buzz around the iPad helped propel Apple past Microsoft this week to become the world’s most valuable technology stock, highlighting the remarkable turnaround of a firm that nearly went out of business in the 1990’s.
But Apple does face hurdles to making the iPad a sustainable success. Analysts have warned it could struggle to meet demand for the device and a raft of rivals have launched similar products that could put chip away at its pricing power.
A model with 16 gigabytes of memory and Wi-Fi capability is being sold for ¥48,800 ($537) in Japan, compared with $499 in the United States.
“The real game will start after ‘core users’ have the devices. I imagine a price cut may be necessary before the Christmas holiday season to stimulate demand,” said Michito Kimura, a senior analyst at market research firm IDC Japan.
Supply constraints
Apple now gets almost three-fifths of its revenue outside the US market, and is counting on its pre-existing base of fans that already own an iPod, iPhone or Macintosh computer to add the iPad to their collection.
“I bought it for Web browsing in the lounge room essentially,” said Graham Parr, who had just purchased the iPad at an Apple store in Sydney, one of seven in Australia.
Compared with his iPod touch, the iPad is “much bigger, which is good for me because my eyes are going,” Parr said.
RBC Capital Markets estimates iPad’s total shipments will reach 8.13 million units worldwide by the end of this year.
However, there is some concern that Apple, which contracts out the production of the device and depends on numerous parts suppliers, may not be able to supply enough of the device.
“It’s a little bit hard to say because there’s still going to be supply constraints, but I’m expecting them to sell every single thing they can ship,” Andy Hargreaves, a US-based analyst at Pacific Crest Securities, said ahead of Friday’s launch.
Apple suspended taking pre-orders for the device in Japan on 13 May after only three days due to overwhelming demand.
“I’m not going to buy the iPad now as it’s expensive. And I’m a Sony fan,” said Kengo Nakajima, a 19-year old college student who waited in line with his friend Yamanaka at the Ginza store.
Apple has yet to announce a launch date for mainland China, which could prove a much more difficult market to profit from. Bootleg versions of the gadget are being snapped up online and in retail malls in the piracy-prone country.

Courtesy: LiveMint

Users in tough spot as Windows XP SP2 retirement looms

May 28th, 2010

Half of the enterprise computers running the aged Windows XP operating system are still relying on the soon-to-be-retired Service Pack 2 (SP2), a researcher said today.

According to security risk and compliance management provider Qualys, 50 percent of the several hundred thousand PCs it monitors for its clients are still running Windows XP SP2.

Courtesy: Infoworld News

Adobe considers more frequent patch schedule

May 28th, 2010

Adobe Systems is considering patching its applications more frequently after moving to a quarterly patching schedule for its Acrobat and Reader programs last year.

Courtesy: Infoworld News

Career Turning Points: Keep IT All About the Users

May 28th, 2010

Formative Lessons from Successful IT Leaders – A CIO Executive Council Pathways career development monthly series
Courtesy: CIO.in

Apple beats Microsoft as No. 1 in technology

May 28th, 2010

San Francisco: Wall Street has called the end of an era and the beginning of the next one: The most important technology product no longer sits on your desk, but rather fits in your hand.
The moment came on Wednesday when Apple Inc., the maker of iPods, iPhones and iPads, shot past Microsoft Corp., the computer software giant, to become the world’s most valuable technology firm.
This changing of the guard caps one of the most stunning turnarounds in business history for Apple, which had been given up for dead only a decade earlier, and its co-founder and visionary chief executive, Steven P. Jobs. The rapidly rising value attached to Apple by investors also heralds an important cultural shift: Consumer tastes have overtaken the needs of business as the leading force shaping technology.
Microsoft, with its Windows and Office software franchises, has dominated the relationship most people had with their computers for almost two decades, and that was reflected in its stock market capitalization. But the click-clack of the keyboard has ceded ground to the swipe of a finger across a smartphone’s touch screen.
And Apple is in the right place at the right time. Although it still sells computers, twice as much revenue is coming from hand-held devices and music. Overall, the technology industry sold around 172 million smartphones last year, compared with 306 million personal computers, but smartphone sales grew at a pace five times faster.
Stunning turnaround: Apple CEO Steve Jobs at the launch of the iPad. Daniel Acker/Bloomberg
Stunning turnaround: Apple CEO Steve Jobs at the launch of the iPad. Daniel Acker/Bloomberg

Microsoft depends more on maintaining the status quo, while Apple is in a constant battle to one-up itself and create something new, said Peter A. Thiel, co-founder of PayPal and an early investor in Facebook. “Apple is a bet on technology,” he said. “And Apple beating Microsoft is a very significant thing.”

As of Wednesday, Wall Street valued Apple at $222.12 billion (Rs10.6 trillion) and Microsoft at $219.18 billion. The only American firm valued higher is Exxon Mobil Corp., with a market cap of $278.64 billion. On Thursday, at 8pm India time, Wall Street valued Apple at $228,380.90 million and Microsoft $228,911.50 million.
The revenue of the two firms are comparable, with Microsoft at $58.4 billion and Apple at $42.9 billion. Microsoft is sitting on more cash and short-term investments, $39.7 billion, to Apple’s $23.1 billion, which makes the value assigned by the market to Apple—essentially a bet on its future prospects—all the more remarkable.
Microsoft and Apple declined to comment.
Apple’s climb to the top of the heap cements the reputation of Jobs, who once operated in the shadow of Microsoft’s co-founder, Bill Gates.
“It is the single most important turnaround that I have seen in Silicon Valley,” said Jim Breyer, a venture capitalist who has invested in some of the most successful tech firms.
While Apple is at the top of its game, it faces a new and powerful rival in Google Inc., which is battling the company in mobile devices with its Android operating system, and mobile advertising.
Google, with a market cap of $151.43 billion, also appeared to leap ahead of Apple in a new potentially important area, Internet-connected televisions. And Google is steering consumers towards a yet new model of computing in which Internet applications, rather than iPhone or desktop applications, rule.
“The battle has shifted from Microsoft against Apple to Apple against Google,” said Tim Bajarin, a technology analyst who has been following Apple since 1981. “Apple has a significant lead. But Google is going to be a powerful competitor.”
Apple and Microsoft initiated the personal computing revolution in the late 1970s, but Microsoft quickly outflanked Apple and grew to be one of the most profitable businesses ever created.
A little more than a decade ago, Apple, which had pushed out Jobs in 1985, was widely believed to be on the path to extinction.
Michael S. Dell, founder and CEO of Dell Inc., went so far as to suggest that Apple should shut down and return any money to shareholders. (The computer maker is now worth around one-10th of Apple.) Around the same time, Microsoft’s chief technology officer called Apple “already dead”.
But with the return of Jobs to Apple in 1996—and an investment by Microsoft of $150 million—the firm began a slow path to recovery. Apple’s rebirth began in earnest with the introduction of the iPod music players, and Jobs began to gain a reputation for anticipating what consumers want. It elbowed aside Sony Corp. and came to dominate the music distribution business with the iTunes online music store.
Apple later upstaged Nokia Corp., the dominant brand in mobile phones, by introducing the iPhone in 2007. And this year, Jobs shook things up again with the introduction of the iPad, a tablet computer that has the potential to create a new category of computers and once again reshape the way people interact with their devices.
Jobs helped create “the best desktop computer, the best portable music device, the best smartphone and also now the best tablet”, said Steve Perlman, a serial entrepreneur who was an executive at both Apple and Microsoft and is now CEO of OnLive Inc., an online gaming company.
As Apple grew increasingly nimble and innovative, Microsoft has struggled to build desirable updates to its main products and to create large new businesses in areas such as game consoles, music players, phones and Internet search.
Microsoft, which is a component stock of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, has lost half its value since 2000.
Still, Microsoft is a hugely powerful and profitable company in the tech world. Its Windows software runs nine out of every 10 computers, while at least 500 million people use its Office software to perform their daily tasks, such as writing letters or sending email messages. These two franchises account for the bulk of Microsoft’s annual revenue.
But it is Apple that has the momentum. “Steve saw way early on, and way before Microsoft, that hardware and software needed to be married into something that did not require effort from the user,” said Scott G. McNealy, co-founder and long-time CEO of Sun Microsystems Inc., which almost merged with Apple. “Apple’s products are shrink-wrapped and ready to go.”
©2010/THE NEW YORK TIMES
feedback@livemint.com

Courtesy: LiveMint

Fired for a Facebok Joke … Again

May 28th, 2010

Last week we wrote about a possible new trend where companies require their employees to avoid any online mention of the organization. And before that, we (and everyone else) explained why you need to be careful about your online behavior and how you can keep your reputation professional. Even if you blog or post on Twitter at home, your words are open for everyone — including employers past, present and future — to see.

You know this. We know this. Hopefully everyone on any social media site understands this.

However, a social media misstep in Wisconsin has raised some questions about the definition of acceptable online behavior. According to Courthouse News Service, a police and fire department dispatcher posted a joke about being addicted to illegal and prescription drugs on her Facebook page. After the comment she wrote “ha,” indicating it was a joke. The city didn’t find it funny and fired her, even though her drug test proved she didn’t actually take these substances. A city arbitrator said the city needed to allow her back after a 30-day suspension.

According to the city:

“Making stupid jokes on Facebook where the line between public and private communications is admittedly blurred, calls into question that good judgment and common sense of the grievant and her resulting ability to perform her job.”

The arbitrator acknowledges the dispatcher didn’t use her best judgment, but doesn’t think she should be fired. The city persists that she is damaging to their brand.

Now, we’ve heard of people getting fired for many things. Heck, even the SF Weekly blogpoints out that there’s a Facebook page where people post news stories about employees fired due to bad online behavior. (Granted, a Facebook page exists for everything these days, its mere existence isn’t shocking.) But normally termination comes from obvious blunders, such as divulging confidential information, posting inappropriate pictures or badmouthing the company. But now it’s happening due to jokes that are obviously jokes. Think of it as Getting Fired 2.0.

But it still raises some new questions:

  • Would this issue even be in question if it was directed at a person via an offensive comment? After all, offensive jokes are obviously jokes, but they’re still unacceptable and lead to noncontroversial firings all the time.
  • Will this situation affect how you behave online, even on your own time?
  • Could employees and employers avoid these situations if they started using the social media contracts we discussed last year? Or do you think that’s just setting everyone up for too many rules and regulations and ruining social media?

Let us know about your thoughts on the situation and if you’ve encountered anything like this.

Related posts:

  1. You can buy all your gifts with a few clicks of the mouse … but should you? Here at The Work Buzz, we don’t judge. Nor do…
  2. Social media guidelines in your job search and workplace Last week I was in a café when I overheard…
  3. Ask The Work Buzz! How to Answer “Have You Ever Been Fired?” Nicole asks an excellent question: When an interviewer ask if…

Courtesy: The Work Buzz